Elena' s AI Blog

Gemini CLI versus Claude CLI

19 Sep 2025 / 11 minutes to read

Elena Daehnhardt


ChatGPT5: AI Coding Benchmarks – SWE-bench Bash Only (Verified)
I am still working on this post, which is mostly complete. Thanks for your visit!


Chart generated with ChatGPT (OpenAI), using SWE-bench Bash Only (Verified) data from Google DeepMind [14], Anthropic [15], and the official SWE-bench site [13].

On SWE-bench Bash Only (Verified), Claude Sonnet 4 outperforms Gemini 2.5 Pro in Python bug-fixing accuracy (≈ 64.9% vs ≈ 53.6%). But this doesn’t mean Claude is always “better.” Bash Only isolates the language model without external tools or complex scaffolds. Gemini still offers strengths in speed, huge context windows, and Google Cloud integration. Benchmarks are helpful yardsticks, not the whole story.

Introduction

Command-line AI tools are the new pocket knives of coding life. They live in your terminal, they answer your odd questions at midnight, and they’re becoming essential for developers who want fast help without leaving the shell.

Two strong contenders here are Gemini CLI (Google) and Claude CLI (Anthropic).
Both bring large language models into the command line, but with different personalities.
Think of Gemini as the fast multitasker with Google DNA, while Claude plays the thoughtful partner with a safety-first streak.

Let’s explore how to set them up, what they can do, how they treat your data, and how they look when we put them against the same benchmark.

TL;DR

Gemini CLI: fast, integrates well with Google Cloud, context window up to 1M tokens, but data may be used for model improvement unless disabled.
Claude CLI: excels at multi-step (agentic) reasoning, stronger default privacy, slightly higher coding accuracy on SWE-bench Bash Only (≈ 64.9% vs 53.6%).
Benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4 leads on raw bug-fixing accuracy, but Gemini brings speed and ecosystem perks.
Practical tip: Try both — they shine in different scenarios and make excellent companions in a developer workflow.

🚀 Gemini CLI

Gemini CLI is Google’s open-source agent that hooks directly into the Gemini models [1], [7], [8]. It’s built for debugging, coding, and problem-solving without leaving your terminal.

Installation

Prerequisites: Node.js 18+ and npm.

1) Install Node.js via NVM (recommended):

curl -o- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nvm-sh/nvm/v0.40.3/install.sh | bash
source "$HOME/.nvm/nvm.sh"
nvm install --lts
nvm use --lts
node -v && npm -v

2) Install Gemini CLI globally:

npm install -g @google/gemini-cli

(npm package)

Authentication

You’ll need a Google AI Studio API key [2], [9].

  • Create a key at AI Studio
  • Save as an environment variable: GEMINI_API_KEY="..."

Basic Usage

  • Interactive:

    gemini
    
  • Quick prompt:

    gemini -p "Write a Python function for Fibonacci numbers"
    
  • File analysis:

    gemini -p "Review this code for bugs: @./script.py"
    

Handy commands: /help, /auth, /memory refresh, /stats

👉 Pro tip: Add a GEMINI.md file with project context so the agent respects your coding style and architecture [7].

☁️ Claude CLI (Claude Code)

Claude CLI (aka Claude Code) brings Anthropic’s Claude into your terminal, leaning heavily on agentic workflows: multi-step tasks where the AI drives the process [4], [5], [10].

Installation

Prerequisites: Node.js 18+ and npm.

  1. Create an API key in the Anthropic Console [5], [6].
  2. Install the CLI:
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code

(npm package)

Configuration

  • Interactive setup:

    claude config
    
  • Or via env var:

    export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="your_claude_api_key_here"
    

Basic Usage

  • Start a session:

    claude
    
  • Continue previous:

    claude --continue
    
  • Resume a session:

    claude --resume
    

Useful slash commands: /init, /clear, /compact, /review [file], /model [name] [10].

Agentic example:

> write a failing test for the new feature
> run the tests and show me the output
> implement the code to make tests pass
> refactor for better performance

🔒 Privacy and Data Security

Gemini CLI

  • With a personal Google account, prompts and outputs may be logged and (unless disabled) used for model improvement [1], [[2] (https://aistudio.google.com/app/apikey)].
  • Enterprise usage falls under Google Cloud’s Data Processing Addendum [12].

Claude CLI

  • Anthropic does not train on your data by default; retention is short or zero under enterprise (ZDR) [5].
  • Human review only with explicit consent [5].
  • Safety-first defaults are part of their product philosophy [4].

Privacy Tips

  1. For sensitive work, use enterprise tiers / ZDR [5], [12].
  2. Opt out of model-improvement data sharing [2].
  3. Check privacy policies regularly.
  4. Keep secrets out of GEMINI.md/CLAUDE.md.

📊 Evidence-Based Comparison

These aren’t my lab tests — they’re drawn from official docs, SWE-bench Bash Only (Verified) results, and credible community reports.

Metric Gemini CLI Claude CLI
Model context window (max) Gemini 2.5 Pro: up to 1M tokens [1] Claude Sonnet 4: up to ~1M tokens [5]
Agentic workflows ReAct loop + MCP integrations [7], [8] Project init, review, compact, model switching [10]
Coding correctness (SWE-bench Bash Only, Verified) 53.6% [13] 64.9% [13]
Hallucination / risky actions Reports of risky commands [3], [11] Marketed as safer defaults [4], [5]
Speed / latency Reported as fast [3], [8] Sometimes slower with large contexts [10]
Privacy posture May feed models unless disabled [2]; enterprise CDPA [12] No training by default; ZDR option [5]

What is SWE-bench Bash Only? SWE-bench tests whether AI models can fix real GitHub issues. The Bash Only track strips away fancy scaffolds, leaving the model alone with a bash shell. It’s the fairest way we currently have of measuring raw LM coding ability. See the official leaderboard.

🐍 Python Integration

You can script both CLIs from Python using the subprocess module. This is handy when you want to wrap prompts into automated tests or pipelines.

👉 For more complex workflows (e.g. maintaining long sessions or parsing structured responses), it’s usually better to switch to the official SDKs: Google GenAI SDK or Anthropic SDK.

Gemini CLI Integration

import subprocess

def call_gemini(prompt: str) -> str:
    """Call Gemini CLI with a prompt and return output."""
    try:
        result = subprocess.run(
            ["gemini", "-p", prompt],
            capture_output=True,
            text=True,
            check=True
        )
        return result.stdout.strip()
    except FileNotFoundError:
        return "Gemini CLI not found. Install with: npm install -g @google/gemini-cli"
    except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
        return f"Gemini CLI error: {e.stderr}"

# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
    response = call_gemini("Write a Python function to reverse a string")
    print(response)

Claude CLI Integration

import subprocess

def call_claude(prompt: str, continue_session: bool = False) -> str:
    """Call Claude CLI with a prompt and return output."""
    try:
        command = ["claude"]
        if continue_session:
            command.append("--continue")
        command.append(prompt)

        result = subprocess.run(
            command,
            capture_output=True,
            text=True,
            check=True
        )
        return result.stdout.strip()
    except FileNotFoundError:
        return "Claude CLI not found. Install with: npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code"
    except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
        return f"Claude CLI error: {e.stderr}"

# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
    response = call_claude("Create a JavaScript debounce function")
    print(response)

🎯 Choosing the Right Tool

  • Choose Gemini CLI for speed, affordability, and Google Cloud integration.
  • Choose Claude CLI for careful reasoning, lower hallucination risk, and privacy-first design.
  • Use both if you enjoy cross-checking answers or want redundancy.

Conclusion

Both CLIs make your terminal a bit smarter — but in different ways. Gemini is like the eager assistant who’s quick with answers, while Claude is the thoughtful partner who slows down just enough to avoid mistakes.

Benchmarks like SWE-bench Bash Only [13] give us a grounded comparison, but they’re not the whole story. The real test is how well these tools fit into your daily work.

References

  1. Gemini models overview – Google AI
  2. Google AI Studio – API keys & activity controls
  3. Gemini CLI tutorial – LogRocket
  4. Claude 3.5 Sonnet launch – Anthropic
  5. Anthropic docs – Models overview & privacy
  6. Anthropic API docs – Getting started & API keys
  7. Gemini CLI – Google Developers docs
  8. Gemini CLI – Google Cloud Code Assist docs
  9. Google GenAI SDK & API usage
  10. Claude Code overview – Anthropic docs
  11. Gemini CLI security flaw report – TechRadar
  12. Google Cloud Data Processing Addendum
  13. SWE-bench Bash Only (Verified) leaderboard
  14. Gemini 2.5 Pro “thinking” update – Google DeepMind
  15. Claude 4 launch – Anthropic
desktop bg dark

About Elena

Elena, a PhD in Computer Science, simplifies AI concepts and helps you use machine learning.




Citation
Elena Daehnhardt. (2025) 'Gemini CLI versus Claude CLI', daehnhardt.com, 19 September 2025. Available at: https://daehnhardt.com/blog/2025/09/19/gemini-cli-vs-claude-cli/
All Posts